California court: poisoning coworker was outside scope of employment, employer not vicariously liable
Montague et al. v. AMN Healthcare, Inc., No. D063385 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 21, 2014).
Appeal Court rules that franchisee and its employees were carrying out Petro-Canada’s work for purposes of WCB Act
In Petro-Canada v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board), 2009 BCCA 396, the BC Court of Appeal ruled that a franchisee and its employees were carrying out Petro-Canada’s work for purposes of WCB Act. You can read a summary of the case ("Vicarious Liability - Franchisor as "Employer"") by Davis LLP here.
James C. Morton, at Steinberg Morton Frymer LLP, has written a paper on, "Vicarious Liability in Sexual Assault" (undated).
The paper discusses an employer's liability where an employee commits a sexual assault. In particular, it addresses the decision in Weingerl v. Seo, 2003 CanLII 13285 (ON S.C.), appeal allowed in part 2005 CanLII 21356 (ON C.A.).
Mothers Against Drunk Drivers Canada, or MADD Canada, have prepared "An Employer's Guide to Understanding and Avoiding Alcohol Liability (Second Edition)", with the assistance of a professor in the Faculty of Law, University of Western Ontario. It provides a thorough review of the key cases in Canada on liability for alcohol related incidents and accidents.