Skip to Content

Employment Contracts

Class action lawsuit launched against Canadian Hockey League for breach of employment standards obligations

Ontario lawyer Ted Charney, Charney Lawyers, announced that he has filed a class action lawsuit against the Canadian Hockey League for breach of employment standards legislation as it relates to the junior hockey players who play in the league. This is his press release:

CHL CLASS ACTION LAUNCHED TORONTO, October 20, 2014 - A class action has been commenced on behalf of all players in the Ontario Hockey League (OHL), Western Hockey League (WHL), and the Quebec Major Junior Hockey League (QMJHL) who entered into contracts with the teams in those leagues. It is alleged that the contracts with the players are employment contracts that contravene the minimum wage set by the legislation governing each jurisdiction where a team is domiciled.

The defendants are the Canadian Hockey League, the OHL, the WHL, the QMJHL, and the sixty teams that play in each of these leagues.  read more »

Clause that required veterinarian to pay former employer if she set up practice in same area enforceable

Jurisdiction: - British Columbia

In Rhebergen v. Creston Veterinary Clinic Ltd., 2014 BCCA 97, the majority of the BC Court of Appeal ruled that a non-compete type clause in an employment agreement that required a veterinarian to pay her former employer prescribed amounts if she set up her own practice in the same area within a three year total period, was enforceable.

The headnote / summary of the case is as follows:  read more »

SCC: Restrictive covenant rules differ depending on whether tied to sale of business or employment contract

In Payette v. Guay inc., 2013 SCC 45,  the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that the rules applicable to restrictive covenants differ depending on whether the covenants are tied to a sale of a business or to an employment contract. For more information on this case, see my previous entry here: "SCC to hear Quebec case on impact of sale of business, wrongful dismissal on enforceability of non-compete".