US National Labor Relations Board: Northwestern U scholarship football players are employees, can unionize
The US National Labor Relations Board (N.L.R.B.) ruled today that Northwestern University scholarship football players are employees and therefore can unionize and bargain collectively. The ruling was contained in a 24-page decision issued by Peter Ohr, a
regional director of the N.L.R.B.
The university has posted the following statement on its website in response to the ruling:
Statement by Alan K. Cubbage, Vice President for University Relations, in Regard to Decision by NLRB Regional Director
March 26, 2014 | by Alan K. Cubbage
EVANSTON, Ill. --- Northwestern University is disappointed by today's ruling by the regional director of the National Labor Relations Board finding that Northwestern University's football players who receive grant-in-aid scholarships are employees and directing that a secret ballot election be held to determine whether the football players should be represented by the College Athletes Players Association for purposes of collective bargaining with Northwestern University. read more »
Terminated employee ordered to pay UBC $5,000 in costs due to improper conduct during human rights proceeding
In Wells v. UBC and others (No. 5), 2011 BCHRT 176, an employee terminated by the University of British Columbia ("UBC") for benefits fraud was ordered by the BC Human Rights Tribunal to pay UBC $5,000 in costs as a result of her improper conduct during a human rights proceeding.
The order was made pursuant to section 37(4) of the BC Human Rights Code.
The improper conduct in question was misrepresentations she had made to the Tribunal regarding why she had delayed in filing her late complaint.
A story in The Province about this decision can be found here: "Fired worker must cover $5g in costs" (July 8, 2011).
In R. v Cole, 2011 ONCA 218, a criminal law case, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that a high school teacher had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of a work laptop computer on which he was entitled to store personal information.
However, the appeal court further ruled in its March 22, 2011 decision that: read more »